Housing Without Developers
Very well expressed point of view that challenges our notions of housing equity, aspiration, size and much more. We need a lot more innovative thinking on design and policy and a lot more user participation to improve shelter for the urban poor.
Last week Studio X Mumbai held a day long workshop provocatively titled “Housing without Developers”. As elaborated on their website, the workshop tried to challenge the seeming inevitability of market based solutions to problems that are themselves closely associated with the privatization of housing markets. The participants in the workshop discussed how the development of slum housing in India and public housing in the west challenges the accepted norms of market based solutions. This blog post does not sum up the many interesting points made by the housing activists, planners and academics at the workshop, but discusses a couple of concepts that got me thinking about housing and policy in the city.
Aspiration:
Its often argued that slum redevelopment schemes in Mumbai succeed as slum dwellers themselves “aspire” to live in apartments and are ashamed of the slums that they inhabit. Asher Ghertner terms this “Aesthetic Govermentality”. Liza…
View original post 625 more words
Posted on April 2, 2013, in Urban Planning & Policy. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.
Leave a comment
Comments 0