Our public spaces need our involvement and passion

Contemporary design thinking rejects the idea of the top down approach to community spaces. Yet in India the design of urban public spaces remain a government led and planner driven exercise. If the government can reinvent itself as an enabled in an area as urgent and massive in terms of demand as housing, then why cannot the government facilitate a more participative process of design for our cities and community spaces? I am inclined to think this is a matter of convenience for the government. Where it is impossible to fund large scale initiatives, the role of a facilitator offers a convenient mode to invite private sector funding. But even for smaller projects, the community comprising of individual residents, corporations and citizen groups can contribute in many ways to creating more meaningful and relevant public spaces. Further, by being loved, owned and used, public spaces assume a deeper meaning in the life of the city, lowering the costs associated with maintenance and adding immensely to the value of the city. Today, cities the world over are using such spaces to attract revenue. Rock concerts in iconic locations, a sculpture commissioned to a famous artist, a carnival, there are many ways to do this.

But first the thinking needs to change. Is there a way citizens can take ideas to the government and initiate this process of catalysing change in our public spaces. Even as urban India comes into it’s own. Indian cities are seeing a renaissance of culture, a renewed sense of the need to increase interactivity as cities grow and threaten to become impersonal and alienating. As citizens, there is a felt need to embrace the city and for the city to embrace them in turn. Art galleries, coffee houses and malls are some popular venues where we see this happen. But these are elite spaces. Imagine if the same kind of logic was extended into public spaces like metro stations, squares, parks, plazas, intersections and street markets. These are golden opportunities to build a sense of identity, to communicate messages related to lifestyle, safety, health or responsible behaviour, to promote community expression and local artists, to provide exposure to schoolkids and old people, office goers and homemakers if we can find ways to engage them all.

Add to this the digital dimension. In a world where social media is on the fingertips of a large number of citizens and even a significant chunk of the underserved carry mobile phones, building a participatory interface is entirely doable. I was reading today about the REBAR Design Collective in San Francisco who are transforming public space by citizen driven guerilla design interventions like converting parking spaces into a temporary public space. Some of their guerilla actions have been taken up and formalised by the city government, slowly they are changing the way citizens and governments think about design and public space. The Project for Public Spaces is New-York based organisation that works on place-making projects and even develops policy alongside governments to develop public spaces for communities. There are many other initiatives out there doing excellent work in this area. However, we need many more local ones in India.

We need to belong to our cities, be passionate about them and give ourselves unto them. We need to make public spaces alive and accessible to all. A stronger connection with the city we live in reinforces our sense of identity, opens endless avenues for us to grow as individuals and as a society and opens our eyes to the variety of experiences this world has on offer.

About ramblinginthecity

I am an architect and urban planner, a writer and an aspiring artist. I love expressing myself and feel strongly that cities should have spaces for everyone--rich, poor, young, old, healthy and sick, happy or depressed--we all need to work towards making our cities liveable and lovable communities.

Posted on July 20, 2011, in Politics & Citizenship, Urban Planning & Policy. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. Incidentally, do read up if you already havent on the San Francisco Octavia Boulevard project, where the citizens of SF actually rejected first govt proposals to rebuild a huge freeway, and instead opted for, and fully designed and live their boulevard.

  2. Traditionally in smaller communities such as villages where there are no ‘government owned’ public spaces. You do see art….rangoli drawn every morning in the south. I think as we have become urban and our rights were curtailed in terms of having a say or do about public spaces. It has become the realm of the govt. and the poor. So much so that in neighborhoods parks and even streets are behind gates and walls in order to preserve our efforts to maintain open spaces. I think communities need to relearn how to stake claim, share and cherish local public spaces as they do in smaller communities and villages.

    • i do agree. the key lies in our sense of belonging, or lack thereof…urban life has set in motion a deep sense of rootlessness that has all sorts of negative effects, crime being one of them. its an interesting socio-cultural-economic composite issue to think about!

  1. Pingback: Internal migration and urbanization: Why we need a nuanced view of how these intersect | ramblinginthecity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: